QUEST FOR PEACE IN LITERATURE AND FILM: PACS 312

 

WENDY YU: 00165108

 

Reflections on

“Before the Rain”

By Milcho Manchevski

 

I admit to being utterly captivated by the concept behind “Before the Rain”. As an art film, I absolutely love it. As social commentary, I am somewhat disappointed by it. Even though the same hysteria against the different backdrops of London versus a Balkan village emphasizes the superficiality of adjectives such as civilized and primitive, some viewers will definitely walk away with the impression that “they are just barbarians killing each other” (Czeslaw Milosz). Quotes such as “war is the rule, peace is an exception” will leave most of us drained of optimism. Yet, I do not think that Manchevski intends to despair. In fact, I believe that his main objective is to show us how to escape the circle.

 

It is impossible to order the three segments of the film so that time flows in one direction. A circular moon illuminates every night and a circular storyline challenges the idea of history as automatic progress. We like to think that children are innocent. We like to think that time will bring peace by allowing us to forget past hostilities. Manchevski, however, demands that we think again. At the beginning of the film, children are shown exploding bullets into the turtle trapped in the circle of burning flames. We are the children creating the circle of violence; we are also the turtle trapped in it. In “Words”, we are shocked by the senseless aggression of the character that shoots the cat on the monastery roof. In "Pictures", that very character is petting his donkey's head and never touched a gun until Mitre drops one into his hands.

 

Once inside the circle, the perversion of innocence is just a matter of time and there is no private path to salvation. You cannot find real peace by living in a monastery and taking a vow of silence. You cannot find real peace by becoming a Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer and not taking sides. Kiril and Aleksandar are confronted with visions of Zamira and Hana, respectively, as if projected by their own conscience. However, at the crucial moments, they make different decisions. Kiril seems unaware of the full consequence of his decision. He tells Zamira that everything will be all right in a language that she does not even understand. Aleksandar is the one that breaks the circle of violence and brings about the rain.

 

Manchevski weaves together the conscious and the subconscious into a hyper reality above and beyond the real. If we consider each segment independently, each segment makes sense. Zamira dies, Nick dies and Aleksandar dies. After each death, we expect the other characters to do something to make sense of the loss. Yet, knowing the other segments, we know that they do not. The rain provides only temporary relief to the permanent drought. “With a shriek birds flee across the black sky, people are silent, my blood aches from waiting” (Mesa Selimovic).

 

482 words including quotes